PS5: “Byepervisor” exploit files and presentation slides released

wololo

Finger on the pulse of the PlayStation hacking scene since 2006

11 Responses

  1. Unknown person says:

    With the Zeco’s compiled elf, does the hen already work on 2.50?

  2. Xedric says:

    Well Well Well, now i can unbox my OG PS5 right out of its box for the first time (firmware 2.00)

    • G-Man says:

      I took mine out a couple of weeks ago – seems mine was on 3.2. Enjoyed using etaHEN for a while but it was a deal breaker that sub 4.x has no m.2 support. I am installing a bunch of stuff (including ps4 games) so I really wanted the extra space to ‘move’ ps4 games to it (I set it actually as the default install location). I DO have a 6TB external USB3 HD and that actually seems to work better for some games (that fail to run on internal or m.2…odd). HomeBrew store also doesn’t run on 3.2 or lower it seems. Of course I do this and a week later byepervisor is released. *Sigh* I still think I made the right call for the m.2 support (plus the firmware 4.x is already ancient but gives you the ability to run newer games I guess…though not many). Good luck!

  3. sdf says:

    does this mean day 1 ps5 pros are vulnerable?

    I was adamant on buying because of all the $0ny *** and concord tax stuff, but if it is the case and we get HEN, then ill buy one.

    • Techn010gy says:

      Good luck finding one on 1/2.xx.
      If you do find one it will be very expensive.
      People are paying £1000+ for a used 4.5.
      Just wait, as wololo stated and what i found most important is the fact decryption of kernel is now possible and even though it’s on low Firmware it will educate us on how the system works.
      I think this will lead to a Cyb1k scenario where we can play higher SDK games decrypted on say 2.5 HV Hen.

  4. G-Man says:

    Why does the screenshot indicate firmware support v1.x-5.x…….hmmmm

  5. G-Man says:

    Screenshot up top shows PS5 UMTX Jailbreak (1.xx – 5.xx) – anyone notice that it shows support up to firmware 5.x there? lol

  6. G-Man says:

    MOD why you not approve my comment? Is it negative or incorrect that screenshot shows up to 5.x firmware supported? I know he said sub 3.x firmware but the screenshot from their website RUNNING the exploit shows up to 5.x – Fair to mention for speculation…no?

    • Techn010gy says:

      Upto 5.xx for the UMTX chain part lol!
      Its always been a chained exploit which requires several parts to be cracked, userland etc that ends as a jailbreak etc.
      So yes UMTX upto 5.xx but thats just the webkit part to follow through to HV on 2.5…not 5.x
      Spector is not working on a BDKB implementation which imo is good, if we can keep it like that it will be simpler.

      • G-Man says:

        Dang all my comments went through lol – At any rate – ty Techno1ogy – That makes sense that the webkit exploit works up to 5.x but the HV exploit supports sub 3.x. *cheers*