Advertising (This ad goes away for registered users. You can Login or Register)

Black Friday Sale: Playstation Plus 1 Year subscription is $39.99 (33% off) on Amazon and other retailers, while supplies last.

Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Discuss emulation on HBL. No discussion about how to download illegal content is allowed!
lostsarph
Banned
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:53 pm

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by lostsarph » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:22 pm

psp type=pspgo :| :!:
CFW virsion=5.70 :| :!:
expliot=patapon2demo :| :!:
hpl=109 :| :!:
Advertising

Null
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:08 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by Null » Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:20 am

lostsarph wrote:psp type=pspgo :| :!:
CFW virsion=5.70 :| :!:
expliot=patapon2demo :| :!:
hpl=109 :| :!:
... ITS OFFICIAL FIRMWARE (OFW), NOT CUSTOM FIRMWARE (CFW) AND "HBL", NOT "HPL".

Anyway, I think 5.70 may have bad compatibility with homebrew, you can try upgrading (I suggest you don't) to like, 6.10 (6.20 has poorer homebrew compatibility apparently. Also, please describe what happens...

Does the PSP switch off when you try to load the homebrew? Does it return to the XMB or to the HBL Menu? Does it show any type of error message?
You can try running the HBL Debug version, let the homebrew crash and post the debug log (dbglog) here.
Advertising

Omnija
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by Omnija » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:29 pm

Null wrote:
lostsarph wrote:psp type=pspgo :| :!:
CFW virsion=5.70 :| :!:
expliot=patapon2demo :| :!:
hpl=109 :| :!:
... ITS OFFICIAL FIRMWARE (OFW), NOT CUSTOM FIRMWARE (CFW) AND "HBL", NOT "HPL".

Anyway, I think 5.70 may have bad compatibility with homebrew, you can try upgrading (I suggest you don't) to like, 6.10 (6.20 has poorer homebrew compatibility apparently. Also, please describe what happens...

Does the PSP switch off when you try to load the homebrew? Does it return to the XMB or to the HBL Menu? Does it show any type of error message?
You can try running the HBL Debug version, let the homebrew crash and post the debug log (dbglog) here.
that's full of shyt that 6.20 has a poorer homebrew compatibility den 6.10, i used to have 6.10 and tons of homebrew didn't work and only worked after i upgraded to 6.20. so don't say things unless you 1 experienced it or 2 haveb fully tested it.

JJS
Big Beholder
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by JJS » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:07 pm

Omnija wrote:that's full of shyt that 6.20 has a poorer homebrew compatibility den 6.10, i used to have 6.10 and tons of homebrew didn't work and only worked after i upgraded to 6.20. so don't say things unless you 1 experienced it or 2 haveb fully tested it.
You say this with so much confidence (and unnecessary aggression) and yet it is so wrong.

HBL has the best homebrew compatibility for up to 6.10 on a 2000/3000. All GO firmwares have essentially the same compatibility, the differences come from the used game exploit only. So it would be safe to update a GO to 6.20 if you want to still use the Patapon exploit.

I guess this myth stems from the time when the 6.20 testing thread was by far the one with the most entries. Also in HBL before R96 there was no difference between HBL on any of the firmwares. There were changes in R99 that made HBL much better for 6.20 on 2000/3000 too, but it still inferior to lower firmwares. Some further reading material about it here and here.

Null
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:08 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by Null » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:43 am

JJS wrote:
Omnija wrote:that's full of shyt that 6.20 has a poorer homebrew compatibility den 6.10, i used to have 6.10 and tons of homebrew didn't work and only worked after i upgraded to 6.20. so don't say things unless you 1 experienced it or 2 haveb fully tested it.
You say this with so much confidence (and unnecessary aggression) and yet it is so wrong.

HBL has the best homebrew compatibility for up to 6.10 on a 2000/3000. All GO firmwares have essentially the same compatibility, the differences come from the used game exploit only. So it would be safe to update a GO to 6.20 if you want to still use the Patapon exploit.

I guess this myth stems from the time when the 6.20 testing thread was by far the one with the most entries. Also in HBL before R96 there was no difference between HBL on any of the firmwares. There were changes in R99 that made HBL much better for 6.20 on 2000/3000 too, but it still inferior to lower firmwares. Some further reading material about it here and here.
Ah, so thats how it is... I thought it was the same for all models.

EDIT::
Omnija wrote:that's full of shyt that 6.20 has a poorer homebrew compatibility den 6.10, i used to have 6.10 and tons of homebrew didn't work and only worked after i upgraded to 6.20. so don't say things unless you 1 experienced it or 2 haveb fully tested it.
I upgraded my PSP to 6.20 from 6.10 and after that many of my homebrew did not work. So yes I have experienced it.
Last edited by Null on Thu Dec 09, 2010 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Omnija
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by Omnija » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:42 am

JJS wrote:
Omnija wrote:that's full of shyt that 6.20 has a poorer homebrew compatibility den 6.10, i used to have 6.10 and tons of homebrew didn't work and only worked after i upgraded to 6.20. so don't say things unless you 1 experienced it or 2 haveb fully tested it.
You say this with so much confidence (and unnecessary aggression) and yet it is so wrong.

HBL has the best homebrew compatibility for up to 6.10 on a 2000/3000. All GO firmwares have essentially the same compatibility, the differences come from the used game exploit only. So it would be safe to update a GO to 6.20 if you want to still use the Patapon exploit.

I guess this myth stems from the time when the 6.20 testing thread was by far the one with the most entries. Also in HBL before R96 there was no difference between HBL on any of the firmwares. There were changes in R99 that made HBL much better for 6.20 on 2000/3000 too, but it still inferior to lower firmwares. Some further reading material about it here and here.
when i used to have 6.10 - 4 homebrew games did not launch at all , such as psp R and i dont remember the other 3, the minuite i updated to 6.20 all of them worked perfectly. that why im so confident about it, as well as it was before revision 99, must of been revision 95 i think i changed to 6.20 due to the few games i wanted to play did not work on 6.10, and this isint based on the fact that there is more queries of test set up for 6.20 den 6.10. i also noticed it ran snes emualtors way faster on the 6.20 then it did on the 6.10, i used to have to turn the sound emulation off for it to run normal speed at all time.

Mr. X
Retired Mod
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:01 am
Location: England

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by Mr. X » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:11 am

Omnija wrote:that why im so confident about it
Sorry, but I just had to laugh. You can be as confident as you like, but JJS programmed the dang thing and I'm fairly certain that he knows what he's talking about.

Anyway, what does this have to do with emulation exactly?
All HBL Revisions: Binaries + Source | Topic
TN HEN Releases: Download

User avatar
Pie
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by Pie » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:34 pm

that's full of shyt that 6.20 has a poorer homebrew compatibility den 6.10,
tl;dr: 6.10 is better then 6.20
when i used to have 6.10 - 4 homebrew games did not launch at all , such as psp R and i dont remember the other 3, the minuite i updated to 6.20 all of them worked perfectly.
tl;dr: 6.20 is better then 6.10

Make up your mind before you start arguments about this

JJS
Big Beholder
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by JJS » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:38 pm

Pie, I think you misunderstood. His argument was that 6.20 > 6.10, no ambiguity there.

Besides that, as Mr. X already remarked, we will now return to the topic.

lostsarph
Banned
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:53 pm

Re: Working Emulators And Known Issues With Emulators

Post by lostsarph » Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:18 am

never mind guys i dont want it anymore!

Post Reply

Return to “Emulation”