[NEW THEORY] Universe Explained : Relative location approach

[TiPi]

Hey guys!

A couple of weeks ago I had a strange, explaining dream. It allowed me to understand the creation and evolution of the universe. I've written an article about it, and did some research. I met some experts and nobody was able to deny my new theory. Thoughts on this new theory are more than welcome!

http://codingncracking.blogspot.com/201 ... erent.html

[Disturbed0ne]

I like this theory!

I've had "somewhat" similar thoughts about the universe and the "Big Bang", I've always believed deep down that it's the most plausible theory that I've read anywhere and the way you word things just reinforces some of the things that I've thought about when I think about how the universe was formed. I've always thought of myself as a "I have to see it to believe it" kind of person so I take most things with a grain of salt, your theory and how you explain it just makes sense to me in a way that not many other things have.

I'm really looking forward to reading more of your writings about coding, the universe and anything else that you decide to share with us.

(It's nice to know that there are other people who share a lot of the same interests as me who also think somewhat like I do)

[nisarg_kolhe]

Still, whatever theory we follow, somewhere contradicts with the laws of physics! Anyways you did a great research on that!
Looking forward to more articles like this on your blog!

[frank]

God made the world. Thread solved. Please lock.




I still believe in Creation...

[Xian Nox]

God made the world. Thread solved. Please lock.




I still believe in Creation...

I don't care... Thread lock request denied.

[TiPi]

God made the world. Thread solved. Please lock.




I still believe in Creation...

Obviously those particles could have been created by your God, I respect your opinion. Many people think their God must have created the Big Bang, I try to prove that that theory could be wrong..

Anyways, thanks for the feedback!

[Disturbed0ne]

God made the world. Thread solved. Please lock.




I still believe in Creation...

So does that mean that you're not open to any other explanation?

It's one thing to have "faith" in something but it's also nice to have the ability or even the sheer WANT to also see it proven scientifically. (My statement isn't bashing religion at all, I'm Agnostic, not Atheist, so I can't prove a God exists or doesn't exist. I just like to keep the ability to think one way or the other without being called a crazy person. I like being able to use logic in my life but I also like the fact that there is still so many things that are unproven in the universe)

(I'm also aware that it's sometimes very hard to decipher sarcasm over the internet)

[m0skit0]

Reading it...

I love science! Especially astrology

Astrology? Really? That's not a science... Didn't you actually mean "astronomy"?

God made the world.

That doesn't solve anything: who/what created God? Anyway fortunately people try to give explanations to the world using logic and not only words about stuff that can't be proven. I can also say unicorns do exist, and you can't prove it false... The question here is to prove your explanation, and God cannot be proven, thus not valid explanation.

[m1k33]

Hey guys!

A couple of weeks ago I had a strange, explaining dream. It allowed me to understand the creation and evolution of the universe. I've written an article about it, and did some research. I met some experts and nobody was able to deny my new theory. Thoughts on this new theory are more than welcome!

http://codingncracking.blogspot.com/201 ... erent.html

Your theory is almost the same as this one

We all know that objects in our universe expand, they distance from each other. Once their particles enter the "absolute coördinate border zone", their particles may get stuck between those forces of the parallel (or the same, depends on how you look at it) universe, they would compress due the force "pushing" the particles together. Eventually all particles in our universe will be compressed. It would take a (very) long time. Anyways, we're now at a point that we have that one "collection" of all particles together. Wait a minute.. we've seen that (more or less) before in the Big Bang Theory!
Due the pressure and chemical reactions, these particles could explode. All the particles are now expanding again, distancing from each other. Now go back at the beginning of this paragraph and join me in an infinite loop!

This still doesn't answer the question "Where did that singularity from the first Big Bang came from?"

[Disturbed0ne]

This still doesn't answer the question "Where did that singularity from the first Big Bang came from?"

There is no beginning or end in an "infinite loop".