I'd suggest another alternative but nah. Don't wanna ruin nice things.
Package Installer on firmware 3.60
Forum rules
Forum rule Nº 15 is strictly enforced in this subforum.
Forum rule Nº 15 is strictly enforced in this subforum.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:12 am
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
Have people tied using OpenCMA instead of QCMA?
I'd suggest another alternative but nah. Don't wanna ruin nice things.
I'd suggest another alternative but nah. Don't wanna ruin nice things.
Advertising
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
oCMA is just a patched CMA so it doesn't look for updates bruh, It doesn't have the pkg install features of QCMA.PixelButts wrote:Have people tied using OpenCMA instead of QCMA?
I'd suggest another alternative but nah. Don't wanna ruin nice things.
Advertising
anon wrote:If you can't trust a 600 year old vampire in a prepubescent girl's body, who can you trust?
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:12 am
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
I keep forgetting devkit cma isn't oCMAfate6 wrote:oCMA is just a patched CMA so it doesn't look for updates bruh, It doesn't have the pkg install features of QCMA.PixelButts wrote:Have people tied using OpenCMA instead of QCMA?
I'd suggest another alternative but nah. Don't wanna ruin nice things.
My bad :v
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
Don't suppose this does any good for the PS TV? Cause I installed this on my ps tv and it opens but it says to connect "vita" to the a PC with a usb cable.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:12 am
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
You can TRY (and I do mean this) using a Male-Male usb cableWrozen wrote:Don't suppose this does any good for the PS TV? Cause I installed this on my ps tv and it opens but it says to connect "vita" to the a PC with a usb cable.
It's a very weird cable and usually rarely shows up but if you had the time you could see if that would allow any access.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 8:12 pm
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
Whenever I try to install my .pkg of Spyro 1 it wont install, fails at expanding package
Do I need to be in idu mode after I've replaced the package installer with the Dex one? I thought the whole point of the DEX version was to not need IDU
Do I need to be in idu mode after I've replaced the package installer with the Dex one? I thought the whole point of the DEX version was to not need IDU
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:12 am
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
The DEX one is to get the real Package Installer.ikilledzeus wrote:Whenever I try to install my .pkg of Spyro 1 it wont install, fails at expanding package
Do I need to be in idu mode after I've replaced the package installer with the Dex one? I thought the whole point of the DEX version was to not need IDU
Theres a modified CEX package installer that requires henkaku to operate if needed.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 8:12 pm
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
I have the one that smoke released
Not 100% but I'm pretty sure it's a Dex version
Not 100% but I'm pretty sure it's a Dex version
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:28 am
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
For DRM PKG files, yes.ikilledzeus wrote:Whenever I try to install my .pkg of Spyro 1 it wont install, fails at expanding package
Do I need to be in idu mode after I've replaced the package installer with the Dex one?
Re: Package Installer on firmware 3.60
becuase you say the modified cex version needs henkaku, you make is sound like the real dex package installer will work once installed on cex firmware, without henkaku...PixelButts wrote:The DEX one is to get the real Package Installer.ikilledzeus wrote:Whenever I try to install my .pkg of Spyro 1 it wont install, fails at expanding package
Do I need to be in idu mode after I've replaced the package installer with the Dex one? I thought the whole point of the DEX version was to not need IDU
Theres a modified CEX package installer that requires henkaku to operate if needed.
this is right?
- yes, it does, i tested. nitendo's dev apps have dev encryption and so they won't load on no-dev consoles.
nice that sony doesn't do this.
it's very useful cool