Advertising (This ad goes away for registered users. You can Login or Register)

mips signatures to help RE

Forum rules
Forum rule Nº 15 is strictly enforced in this subforum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Zecoxao
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:27 pm

mips signatures to help RE

Post by Zecoxao » Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:18 am

dunno if people already have this or not (i assume most of them have if they have the psp sdk) but here are some mips signatures to help Reverse Engineering on IDA.

https://mega.co.nz/#!BhM1WTrb!kGl3E4V-3 ... G56LvNDE_g

edit: if this is illegal i'll remove the link and give only to those who ask
Advertising
My sig is original :D

xyz
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:06 pm

Re: mips signatures to help RE

Post by xyz » Tue Jul 15, 2014 5:09 pm

Aren't these different between SDK releases?
Advertising

User avatar
qwikrazor87
Guru
Posts: 2868
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:23 pm
Location: The North Pole

Re: mips signatures to help RE

Post by qwikrazor87 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:52 pm

xyz wrote:Aren't these different between SDK releases?
User NIDs are always the same, it's most of the kernel NIDs that change between each update.
PSP 2001 - TA-085 - 6.61 PRO-C2
PS Vita 3G - PCH-1101 - 3.65 HENkaku Ensō
Maxwest Nitro 4 phone - Android 5.1
Laptop - Toshiba Satellite L305D-S5974 - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

xyz
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:06 pm

Re: mips signatures to help RE

Post by xyz » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:19 pm

qwikrazor87 wrote:
xyz wrote:Aren't these different between SDK releases?
User NIDs are always the same, it's most of the kernel NIDs that change between each update.
But what OP posted looks like FLIRT IDA signatures for libs that are distributed with the SDK and are linked to EBOOT binary. I don't think they can have NIDs. Or am I missing something here?

User avatar
Zecoxao
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:27 pm

Re: mips signatures to help RE

Post by Zecoxao » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:36 pm

xyz wrote:
qwikrazor87 wrote:
xyz wrote:Aren't these different between SDK releases?
User NIDs are always the same, it's most of the kernel NIDs that change between each update.
But what OP posted looks like FLIRT IDA signatures for libs that are distributed with the SDK and are linked to EBOOT binary. I don't think they can have NIDs. Or am I missing something here?
they ARE IDA FLIRT signatures. those are from the 1.50 sdk. i found them circulating online. they're pretty useless though.
My sig is original :D

Post Reply

Return to “Programming and Security”