new_PSXdecrypter for 6.60 available !

[Yoti]

Advertising

It wasnt open source, so no need to release the source.

Source code is came with binaries so it's an open source tool.

[Rise Above Death]

Advertising

Shouldn't the source be released since the original was? Just a thought. Great to see more classic apps run on newer CFW.

You always may revers binaries Only EBOOT is changed.

If only I had the knowledge to do that... I can do some basic Java and that's it.

[Ombra91]

It wasnt open source, so no need to release the source.

Source code is came with binaries so it's an open source tool.

Hmm, maybe i misunderstood, but then all programs are open source? just reverse the binaries
Dax never relased source for his program

[stevealexanderames]

It wasnt open source, so no need to release the source.

Source code is came with binaries so it's an open source tool.

Hmm, maybe i misunderstood, but then all programs are open source? just reverse the binaries
Dax never relased source for his program

nope, not every program is open source, but let's say that once you reverse one then the result becomes "your work"

btw it's true that DAX psxdecrypter comes with src

[Ombra91]

Ahhh, ok
Sorry for mistcake

[The Z]

The source is under no license, so there is no need to release the source (said SuperCow).

[Rise Above Death]

The source is under no license, so we there is no need to release the source (said SuperCow).

No reason to but imo it's the right thing to do. My opinion doesn't matter so whatever.

[adolescent]

Example source (my mods, not ops).

Only 2 modifications needed to main.c -- removing the 303 check (line 89) and changing the pops.prx loadmoduleto load a copy of 303 pops from the current directory (line 168). If there is really a need for this It would be better to create a new version based on popsloader source that could use different/newer pops as this one has hard coded 3.03 pops decompress offset.

[Coldbird]

Lets not dig into the whole opensource vs closed source debate again... we all know what the up and downsides to it are...
Close-sourcing big developments always hinder the scene in case of departure - like that of DAX, as the original source is lost with the author...

However in the end its always up to the author, no matter what you do... and if DAX didn't provide a license to limit the original developments terms of use, then there is nothing we can do to enforce it.

For those wishing to reverse engineer though, the latest decission at the european court gives you the right to reverse engineer whatever you want as algorithms are no longer protectable by copyright.

[Yoti]

Example source (my mods, not ops).

Did same things few days ago