Advertising (This ad goes away for registered users. You can Login or Register)

PSVita homebrew packaging standards discussion

Rejuvenate is a native homebrew platform for PS Vita. Read more about Rejuvenate here.
173210
Guru
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: PSVita homebrew packaging standards discussion

Post by 173210 »

By the way, the device name "vfs" has two faults.
1. "v"
character "v" in "vfs" stands for Vita. But it means nothing because all filesystem devices are on PS Vita. :lol:

2. No digit
Other devices have a digit for the further extension. vfs should also have a digit.

Linux uses bind to mount a directory, so we can name it bf0.
Advertising
Donate!
Bitconin: 1Aq3NruiohEvUsGJAmHoXjTq764HDS5zef
Paypal: http://173210.github.io/
hgoel0974
Retired Mod
Posts: 2155
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:42 pm
Location: New York

Re: PSVita homebrew packaging standards discussion

Post by hgoel0974 »

173210 wrote:By the way, the device name "vfs" has two faults.
1. "v"
character "v" in "vfs" stands for Vita. But it means nothing because all filesystem devices are on PS Vita. :lol:

2. No digit
Other devices have a digit for the further extension. vfs should also have a digit.

Linux uses bind to mount a directory, so we can name it bf0.
About point 1, the 'v' was meant to be 'virtual' although your argument makes sense :lol: fs0 might be the better choice.
About point 2, there is a digit there, unless you're suggesting we not have the digit?
Advertising
"If the truth is a cruel mistress, then a lie must be a nice girl"
173210
Guru
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: PSVita homebrew packaging standards discussion

Post by 173210 »

hgoel0974 wrote:
173210 wrote:By the way, the device name "vfs" has two faults.
1. "v"
character "v" in "vfs" stands for Vita. But it means nothing because all filesystem devices are on PS Vita. :lol:

2. No digit
Other devices have a digit for the further extension. vfs should also have a digit.

Linux uses bind to mount a directory, so we can name it bf0.
About point 1, the 'v' was meant to be 'virtual' although your argument makes sense :lol: fs0 might be the better choice.
About point 2, there is a digit there, unless you're suggesting we not have the digit?
Oh, sorry, I missed the digit.
Donate!
Bitconin: 1Aq3NruiohEvUsGJAmHoXjTq764HDS5zef
Paypal: http://173210.github.io/
fate6
Big Beholder
Posts: 7599
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:18 am
Location: [fate6@Canterlot ~]$

Re: PSVita homebrew packaging standards discussion

Post by fate6 »

"virtual file system 0" or "vfs0" is fine IMHO.
Image
anon wrote:If you can't trust a 600 year old vampire in a prepubescent girl's body, who can you trust?
173210
Guru
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: PSVita homebrew packaging standards discussion

Post by 173210 »

Add sfx2sfo · psp2sdk/tools@28bd8e6
https://github.com/psp2sdk/tools/commit ... d50117ef5b

I'll create make_package later.
Donate!
Bitconin: 1Aq3NruiohEvUsGJAmHoXjTq764HDS5zef
Paypal: http://173210.github.io/
Locked

Return to “Rejuvenate”