Unreal Engine 4 Released, Cryengine Subscription Announced

8 Responses

  1. NakedFaerie

    Being cheaper is good as hopefully we will see more games getting released using it.
    BUT looking good and being easier isn’t always a good thing. There might be a lot of new games coming out but hopefully they will be good games. I’ve seen some good looking games that are absolutely ***. For me its the FF series. I think those games look awesome but the gameplay to me is the worst game ever made. I’m not Japanese thats probably why i hate it.

  2. ivo

    whats in an opensource or free dtcp-ip dlna player ?
    softdma is the only one i found and it costs 🙁

  3. David

    I didn’t noticed before that it can be such easy and simple to create a nice looking environment for your game which seems at the same time be very powerful.
    I would prefer Cryengine since I know where it has its roots and that’s why I would support them.

  4. ivo

    i would go for unreal knowing its been in the game way longer

  5. 110706

    This looks fantastic. Well done Epic!

  6. pploco1996

    That video made me want to drop Java and jump right into C++.

  7. R.o.m.e

    …Minimur, WTH happen thi….oh, don’t mind me folks just move along…

  8. jayturns

    just bought unreal engine 4, going to check it out in a bit. Looks great from the videos I have seen.